Jeremiah 34 - 36 - Outline of Jeremiah (MENU page)
God's Word stands Sure, though disobeyed and disregarded.

I. God's sure Word to Zedekiah regarding the outcome of the siege. (34:1-7)
  1. The time of the message:
    during the final siege of Jerusalem (v.1), after the entire country had fallen, with the exception of two other walled cities, which were also under siege (v.6,7). Lachish was 23 miles southwest, and Azekah was 18 miles west southwest of Jerusalem. Babylon, approaching from the north, had completely overrun the country.
  2. The essence of the message:
    1. the fate of the city (v.2)
    2. the fate of Zedekiah (v.3-5): his captivity, his death in captivity (cp. 32:4,5), the mourning for him.
      The "burnings of the former kings" refer to ceremonies of honor (eg., for good king Asa, 2Chr 16:14; but not for evil king Jehoram, 2Chr 21:19). The predicted mourning for Zedekiah was in contrast to the unceremonious disposal of Jehoiakim's body (cp. Jer 22:18,19, also see the Book Notes for that reference). Because of this prophecy, some feel that Zedekiah turned his heart to the Lord, in captivity. However, in Jer 24:8, Zedekiah is named among the "evil figs" which were not restorable, in contrast to the believing remnant (the "good figs") who would be given hearts to seek the Lord. So, perhaps the honor afforded Zedekiah by the people in captivity, was primarily mourning for the loss of the kingdom, as symbolized by the loss of its final king (Lam 4:20).
  3. The sureness of the message: ...for I have pronounced {spoken} the word, saith the Lord. (v.5b)
    In these three chapters, the Hebrew word "dabar" is used 9x in its verb form, meaning "to speak, to pronounce, to declare" (except for one occurrence, all refer to the Lord's message to or through Jeremiah), and 27x in its noun form, translated as the "word" (that which is spoken). The line quoted above could be translated: "for I have pronounced the pronouncement, saith the Lord."
II. The sureness of God's Word demonstrated to Zedekiah by contemporary events.
From Jeremiah ch. 21 to the present chapter, the Word of the Lord has been directed toward Zedekiah and his subjects. In ch. 37,38, the message will be directed even more pointedly to Zedekiah personally. Even so, he remains, in the paralysis of unbelief.
In 34:8 - 36:32, three examples, from the recent past, are presented to Zedekiah, to demonstrate the serious consequences of disregarding God's Word.
  1. Disregard of the Covenant, illustrated by Zedekiah's ineffective covenant (34:8-22)
    1. Zedekiah's decree and covenant of Liberty (v.8-11)...
      • was an act of desperation, during an earlier siege of Jerusalem... This decree and siege are not recorded elsewhere. However, Zedekiah's reign was characterized by rebellion against Nebuchadnezzar, who frequently exercised his military power to force submission (2Chr 36:9-13).
        The dual motivations:
        • a show of righteousness to gain God's favor.
        • a bid to recruit more defenders of the city (ie., the freed servants).
      • was in keeping with God's covenant (v.12-15; Ex 21:2; Deu 15:12).
      • was made before the Lord, in the Temple (v.15).
      • was made by blood (v.18; cp. Gen 15:10,17). The covenanters had pledged to keep the terms of the covenant upon penalty of death.
    2. Zedekiah's covenant was disregarded, as was God's covenant (v.11-16)
      • when the immediate danger had passed (due to the intervention of Egypt, cp. 37:5-9), the freed slaves were again brought under bondage.
    3. The serious consequences of disregard for God's covenant (v.17-22)
      • violation of proclaimed liberty, results in loss of liberty (v.17).
        For enslaving their brethren, whom God had freed (v.13,14), they would be given
        ...into the hand of their enemies (v.20a,21a)
      • violation of blood covenant, results in loss of life (18-22).
        For breaking the covenant, which they had sworn on penalty of death, they would be given
        ...into the hand of them that seek their lives (v.20b,21b)
      • invalidation of the purpose of Zedekiah's decree (to escape Nebuchadnezzar's siege).
        Although the Babylonian armies had withdrawn for a time, they would return. As Zedekiah received this message, he was painfully aware that they had returned (v.1). He had hoped to escape, but it was increasingly evident that he would be given
        ...into the hand of the king of Babylon's army... (v.21c, 22).
      Note: Believers, today, have also entered into a blood covenant with the Lord, and we also will be held accountable for what we do with it. (Heb 10:29)
  2. Disregard of the spoken Word, contrasted with the Rechabites reverence for their ancestor's words. (35:1-19)
    ("I have spoken unto you speaking... I sent my prophets, saying..." v.14,15)
    1. The demonstration of reverence for the word of Jonadab (35:1-11)
      • This event took place sometime during the reign of Jehoiakim (10-20 years prior to this final siege).
      • The Rechabites (v.2,3) were descended from Hobab, Moses' brother-in-law. These people, also referred to as Kenites, accompanied the children of Israel on their journey from Egypt to Canaan. (Num 10:29; Jud 1:16; 4:11; 1Chr 2:54,55). Jonadab had fought alongside Jehu (one of the better kings of the northern kingdom of Israel) to irradicate Baal worship (2Kin 10:15-27). This clan had maintained a nomadic lifestyle, at the direction of Jonadab, until the presence of the Babylonian army forced them to seek refuge in the city (v.10,11). Jaazaniah is mentioned as a prominent leader of this clan (v.3).
      • This event would have been well attested (v.4), having taken place in a prominent place (a centrally located chamber of the Temple), before men of authority and reknown: the sons of "a man of God" (ie., of a prophet), the "princes" (ie., temple officials), a keeper of the door (a position of responsibility).
      • At the Lord's instruction, Jeremiah set wine before the sons of Jonadab. This may be seen as a social honor, rather than an invitation to drunkenness. The abundance of wine indicated the greatness of the honor (cp. Amos 9:14; John 2:10). Yet, they refused the honor, holding their ancestor's words in higher regard.
    2. The denunciation of disregard for the Word of God (v.12-15)
      • Jonadab's commands may or may not have been reasonable (eg., v.6,7), but they were obeyed.
      • The Lord's ways and instructions are perfect (Psa 19:7), yet they are ignored.
    3. The consequences (v.16-19)
      • upon disobedient Judah: the Word pronounced against them would be fulfilled (v.17; cp. 34:5b).
        At the time of Jerusalem's fall, many officials, including the keepers of the door, were among those singled out for destruction by Nebuchadnezzar (2Kin 25:18-21).
      • upon the obedient sons of Jonadab: a perpetual place of honor before the Lord (v.18,19).
        At the time of Jerusalem's fall, Jaazaniah is mentioned among the survivors (2Kin 25:22,23). He is called a Maachathite, because he had been displaced from Maachah, a region northeast of the Sea of Galilee (cp. v.11).
  3. Disregard of the written Word, as shown by Jehoiakim's destruction of the scroll (36:1-32)
    1. The book written (v.1-10) -
      • was God's Word (v.2,4) - These verses describe the inspiration and recording of scripture.
      • "...all that the Lord had spoken {pronounced}..." cp. v.4; 34:5b; 2Pet 1:20,21
      • was intended to warn of judgment, to encourage repentance, to avoid destruction (v.3,7).
      • was read to the people by Baruch, the scribe (v.4-10) -
        • because of Jeremiah's imprisonment (v.5).
        • in the Temple (v.8) - The reading of "the Words of the LORD in the LORD's house" was apparently an unusual occurrence, during the reign of ungodly king Jehoiakim.
        • on the occasion of a fast (v.6b, 9) -
               This was a specially proclaimed fast (v.9) in the ninth month. There is no record of this fast elsewhere. None of Israel's regular feasts or fasts falls in this month.
               The Law commanded observation of a scheduled fast, the Day of Atonement, in the seventh month, for the purpose of personal and national repentance (Lev 16:29; 23:27-32). Evidently, the Day of Atonement had been neglected.
               Judging from the response to the written Word, the proclamation of this fast was not a call for repentance. However, the calling of a fast suggests an appeal to God for deliverance from some national distress. In the fourth year of Jehoiakim (v.1), Jerusalem was under siege by Nebuchadnezzar, because Jehoiakim had rebelled against Babylon (2Kin 24:1). Nebuchadnezzar's victory and taking of a limited number of captives, marked the beginning of the prophesied 70 years captivity (Jer 25:1,11).
    2. The response received (v.11-26) -
      • some of the elders were afraid (v.16). They enquired as to how Baruch had received this convicting message. "He (Jeremiah) pronounced all these words... and I wrote them with ink..." (v.18). Here, "pronounced" is translated from a different Hebrew word (qarab) meaning "to bring near." The word which God had spoken to the listening heart of His prophet was brought near to insensitive and unbelieving hearts through His written Word. (cp. this word in Deu 30:14, "is nigh"; Psa 119:169, "come near")
      • Jehoiakim destroyed the scroll, expressing complete disregard for the message (v.23,24), despite the appeals of a few of the elders (v.25). "They were not afraid, nor rent their garments..." To tear one's garment would be an indication of grief or of repentence. Contrast the response of King Josiah, just 18 years earlier, 2Kin 22:11-13. (The ninth month was mid-winter, corresponding to December, and explaining the fire on the hearth.)
      • the lives of Jeremiah and Baruch were threatened (v.26).
    3. The consequences (v.27-32)
      • God's written Word was preserved despite being burned in the fire (v.27,28,32).
      • God's written Word would be fulfilled in detail (v.29; cp. v.7b; 34:5b; 35:17, Mat 24:35; 5:18).
      • Jehoiakim, and all who disregard it, would be overtaken by the things of which God's Word had warned them. (v.30,31).
      • Jehoiakim's royal lineage would be cut off (at his son Jeconiah's brief reign, Jer 22:30), and his death and burial would be ignominious (Jer 22:19). And so it had been (see Book Notes at Jer 22:19).
      Zedekiah had heard God's Word. He had seen the consequences of his predecessors' disregard of God's Word. How would he respond?
Archaeological Note:
     In the 1970's, archaeologists discovered a cache of bullae in Jerusalem. A bulla is a lump of clay, which was flattened to seal official documents. The sender's name would be impressed upon the clay seal with a signet ring or similar engraved tool.
    The bullae in this cache were apparently hardened by the fire that destroyed Jerusalem in 586 BC. The sealed documents were consumed, but the clay was hardened, preserving these artifacts.
    The names of three men who are mentioned in Ezekiel 34 - 36 were found on different bulla.
[Condensed from "Bulla Lesson from Jeremiah 36," Israel My Glory magazine, July/August 2013, pg. 24.]

Click here to continue the study in Jeremiah 37 - 38
Return to Jeremiah - MENU page.

Limited permission is granted to copy & distribute these notes from

Go to The Book opening page.